Welcome Guest

New Post
Hot Topic
New Poll
Moved Topic
Sticky Topic
No New Post
Old Hot Topic
Old Poll
Announcement
Closed Topic

Posting Disabled

Posting to these forums has been disabled. They will remain as "read only" for your convenience.
Please visit the new forums at http://www.my.speedtv.com/go/forum/viewboard to continue the conversation!

Blast from the past—DMG address the AMA fans

Legend

RankRankRank

Total Posts:  177

Joined  08/27/2009

thewon4 - 19 November 2009 05:25 PM
............. but the Flamminis didn't want to play second fiddle to MotoGP so they changed the rules ..............


Your bosses, the DMG, have no such qualms as long as they rake in the money, I am sure. LOL

Abnormal User

RankRankRankRankRankRank

Total Posts:  1172

Joined  07/04/2009

thewon4 - 19 November 2009 05:25 PM
NDSkies - 19 November 2009 05:18 PM
Not skin crawling, just more vindication for my opinion of you and your posts.


That I'm engaged in low grade trolling?

If people aren't going to listen to reason, I may as well rake them over the coals a bit.


Trolling?

LOL

It is funny if someone were to go back and compare your posts from your first entrance to your posts now and find exactly how much of your thoughts have really changed.

You knew nothing when you showed up.
No history of the series.
No knowledge of racing in general.
You posted utter crap and falsehoods.
Now, you have morphed what others were telling you into a different fantasy world of how racing should work.

It was like a long drawn out ridiculous montage.
You are the Michael Bay of Speed BBS posters.

Ultimate Insider

RankRankRankRankRank

Total Posts:  807

Joined  04/06/2009

Ah. Here it is, I finally found it. I need google for my archives.

This is Kanazawa, ex-President of HRC, talking about the pyramid of road racing and how factories should not run works teams in WSBK or WSS. This might as well be an official release from the MSMA.

http://www.superbikeplanet.com/2003-Jun/030616a.htm

LOL I forgot he actually uses the name CBR-RR to describe the WSBK bikes.

Ultimate Insider

RankRankRankRankRank

Total Posts:  807

Joined  04/06/2009

NDSkies - 19 November 2009 05:35 PM
thewon4 - 19 November 2009 05:25 PM
NDSkies - 19 November 2009 05:18 PM
Not skin crawling, just more vindication for my opinion of you and your posts.


That I'm engaged in low grade trolling?

If people aren't going to listen to reason, I may as well rake them over the coals a bit.


Trolling?

LOL

It is funny if someone were to go back and compare your posts from your first entrance to your posts now and find exactly how much of your thoughts have really changed.

You knew nothing when you showed up.
No history of the series.
No knowledge of racing in general.
You posted utter crap and falsehoods.
Now, you have morphed what others were telling you into a different fantasy world of how racing should work.

It was like a long drawn out ridiculous montage.
You are the Michael Bay of Speed BBS posters.


Yes, I knew nothing. rolleyes

Like when I said that DMG's original proposal was to run WSBK equipment and that they never wanted to run bogus superstock bikes, that was all a lie.

Just like it was a lie when I said the original DSB rules were power-to-weight and the class was supposed to resemble FX, that was all bogus too.

Please, I just never got around to documenting my sources b/c I thought they were widely known around here, and when I realized you guys don't read anything, I didn't have time to go digging.

Legend

RankRankRank

Total Posts:  177

Joined  08/27/2009

I fully agree with Kanazawa and completely disagree with DMG.

Legend

RankRankRank

Total Posts:  177

Joined  08/27/2009

thewon4 - 19 November 2009 05:44 PM

Like when I said that DMG's original proposal was to run WSBK equipment and that they never wanted to run bogus superstock bikes, that was all a lie.


At least this one is. LOL

Legend

RankRankRank

Total Posts:  177

Joined  08/27/2009

thewon4 - 19 November 2009 05:40 PM
Ah. Here it is, I finally found it. I need google for my archives.


LOL LOL LOL

Speed Junkie

RankRankRankRankRankRankRank

Total Posts:  11031

Joined 

thewon4 - 19 November 2009 05:44 PM
NDSkies - 19 November 2009 05:35 PM
thewon4 - 19 November 2009 05:25 PM
NDSkies - 19 November 2009 05:18 PM
Not skin crawling, just more vindication for my opinion of you and your posts.


That I'm engaged in low grade trolling?

If people aren't going to listen to reason, I may as well rake them over the coals a bit.


Trolling?

LOL

It is funny if someone were to go back and compare your posts from your first entrance to your posts now and find exactly how much of your thoughts have really changed.

You knew nothing when you showed up.
No history of the series.
No knowledge of racing in general.
You posted utter crap and falsehoods.
Now, you have morphed what others were telling you into a different fantasy world of how racing should work.

It was like a long drawn out ridiculous montage.
You are the Michael Bay of Speed BBS posters.


Yes, I knew nothing. rolleyes

Like when I said that DMG's original proposal was to run WSBK equipment and that they never wanted to run bogus superstock bikes, that was all a lie.

Just like it was a lie when I said the original DSB rules were power-to-weight and the class was supposed to resemble FX, that was all bogus too.

Please, I just never got around to documenting my sources b/c I thought they were widely known around here, and when I realized you guys don't read anything, I didn't have time to go digging.


Yes, you know nothing. DMG's original proposal did not include 1000cc bikes at all. What you have posted there was the result of Edmondson already pissing off the factories and their belligerence (which I understand) in dealing with him.

Signature:

Future World Champion: http://www.peterlenz.com/

Abnormal User

RankRankRankRankRankRank

Total Posts:  1172

Joined  07/04/2009

thewon4 - 19 November 2009 05:44 PM

Yes, I knew nothing. rolleyes

Like when I said that DMG's original proposal was to run WSBK equipment and that they never wanted to run bogus superstock bikes, that was all a lie.

Just like it was a lie when I said the original DSB rules were power-to-weight and the class was supposed to resemble FX, that was all bogus too.

Please, I just never got around to documenting my sources b/c I thought they were widely known around here, and when I realized you guys don't read anything, I didn't have time to go digging.


You knew press releases from the last 2 years.

You knew nothing about the history of racing.
You knew nothing about the history of the AMA.

You have just changed your fantasy world to incorporate things that you have learned.

Your posts are like Pearl Harbor.

sick

Avatar for mtwracin

Ultimate Insider

RankRankRankRankRank

Total Posts:  905

Joined 

thewon4 - 19 November 2009 05:44 PM
NDSkies - 19 November 2009 05:35 PM
thewon4 - 19 November 2009 05:25 PM
NDSkies - 19 November 2009 05:18 PM
Not skin crawling, just more vindication for my opinion of you and your posts.


That I'm engaged in low grade trolling?

If people aren't going to listen to reason, I may as well rake them over the coals a bit.


Trolling?

LOL

It is funny if someone were to go back and compare your posts from your first entrance to your posts now and find exactly how much of your thoughts have really changed.

You knew nothing when you showed up.
No history of the series.
No knowledge of racing in general.
You posted utter crap and falsehoods.
Now, you have morphed what others were telling you into a different fantasy world of how racing should work.

It was like a long drawn out ridiculous montage.
You are the Michael Bay of Speed BBS posters.


Yes, I knew nothing. rolleyes

Like when I said that DMG's original proposal was to run WSBK equipment and that they never wanted to run bogus superstock bikes, that was all a lie.

Just like it was a lie when I said the original DSB rules were power-to-weight and the class was supposed to resemble FX, that was all bogus too.

Please, I just never got around to documenting my sources b/c I thought they were widely known around here, and when I realized you guys don't read anything, I didn't have time to go digging.

dont need to read anything
I can actually call most of parties involved and even more downstream of the decision makers