J. - 14 November 2009 02:52 PM

johnalex1273 - 14 November 2009 02:42 PM

Lovey-Dovey - 14 November 2009 02:38 PM

By closing the court to the public and sealing the documents, it sends a strong signal of 'incriminating' evidence. Perhaps Brian does some stuff in his private life that many NASCAR fans might find disturbing or disgusting.

Don't blame me, HE is the one that paid the court to be quiet.

I wonder why its anybody's business? Its his private life.

I agree, and when I posted it my intent was not to start a thread speculating on what it was he wanted to hide. I assumed it probably had to do with financial details, but everyone knows what happens when you assume.

What I find bothersome is the appearance of a double-standard. Why should Brian France get special treatment?

Sadly, because there is a law and a corresponding set of standards for some people that differs from those the rest of us live by.

If he is afraid that the rest of the world will find out that he is an idiot, he is just a few years too late on that one.

As I tried to clearly explain before, closing the court to the public and sealing the records opens the case up to speculation of what is going on. Just like keeping post race tech a closed door situation.

Lovey-Dovey - 14 November 2009 03:02 PM

As I tried to clearly explain before, closing the court to the public and sealing the records opens the case up to speculation of what is going on. Just like keeping post race tech a closed door situation.

You're absolutely right. People will completely ignore what is written right in front of their faces. It's what we do ... well, it's what some of us do.

Hopefully, the judge will not permit such a closure, thereby permitting the public, who have a right to know, just exactly what is involved in this:

A computer court code shows the case involves “specific performance,” in which one party seeks a court order to require the other to honor the terms of a contract. But no other details are available.

I'm thinkin' there are no trannies or ladies-for-hire dressed in inappropriate WW2 attire involved in this case.

Of course, I could be wrong.

auntysquat - 14 November 2009 03:07 PM

Lovey-Dovey - 14 November 2009 03:02 PM

As I tried to clearly explain before, closing the court to the public and sealing the records opens the case up to speculation of what is going on. Just like keeping post race tech a closed door situation.

You're absolutely right. People will completely ignore what is written right in front of their faces. It's what we do ... well, it's what some of us do.

Hopefully, the judge will not permit such a closure, thereby permitting the public, who have a right to know, just exactly what is involved in this:

A computer court code shows the case involves “specific performance,” in which one party seeks a court order to require the other to honor the terms of a contract. But no other details are available.

I'm thinkin' there are no trannies or ladies-for-hire dressed in inappropriate WW2 attire involved in this case.

Of course, I could be wrong.

To be honest, Max Mosely was my first thought when I read the title thread. Jumped to that conclusion before reading, so that is what I was looking for in the article I guess.

^ As I suggested earlier, as one of your virtual friends, avert your gaze at the supermarket checkout. Watch the PBS Newshour. There is nothing stranger than the truth.

Edit - your honesty is admirable. One of the reasons I like you.

johnalex1273 - 14 November 2009 02:42 PM

Lovey-Dovey - 14 November 2009 02:38 PM

By closing the court to the public and sealing the documents, it sends a strong signal of 'incriminating' evidence. Perhaps Brian does some stuff in his private life that many NASCAR fans might find disturbing or disgusting.

Don't blame me, HE is the one that paid the court to be quiet.

I wonder why its anybody's business? Its his private life.

I agree it is his business, his life. But a wise old man once told me, "you stir shX+ long enough, your bound to get it on you"

auntysquat - 14 November 2009 03:13 PM

^ As I suggested earlier, as one of your virtual friends, avert your gaze at the supermarket checkout. Watch the PBS Newshour. There is nothing stranger than the truth.

Edit - your honesty is admirable. One of the reasons I like you.

PBS Newshour? I prefer BBC News America.

Lovey-Dovey - 14 November 2009 04:32 PM

auntysquat - 14 November 2009 03:13 PM

^ As I suggested earlier, as one of your virtual friends, avert your gaze at the supermarket checkout. Watch the PBS Newshour. There is nothing stranger than the truth.

Edit - your honesty is admirable. One of the reasons I like you.

PBS Newshour? I prefer BBC News America.

auntysquat - 14 November 2009 02:54 PM

J. - 14 November 2009 02:52 PM

johnalex1273 - 14 November 2009 02:42 PM

Lovey-Dovey - 14 November 2009 02:38 PM

By closing the court to the public and sealing the documents, it sends a strong signal of 'incriminating' evidence. Perhaps Brian does some stuff in his private life that many NASCAR fans might find disturbing or disgusting.

Don't blame me, HE is the one that paid the court to be quiet.

I wonder why its anybody's business? Its his private life.

I agree, and when I posted it my intent was not to start a thread speculating on what it was he wanted to hide. I assumed it probably had to do with financial details, but everyone knows what happens when you assume.

What I find bothersome is the appearance of a double-standard. Why should Brian France get special treatment?

Sadly, because there is a law and a corresponding set of standards for some people that differs from those the rest of us live by.

it's not that the laws are any different for anyone.. it's that SOME can afford to hire lawyers to pursue every single law to its fullest extent.. whereas you and I... not so much