JR90
Posted: 30 December 2008 12:00 AM
Rookie
Total Posts: 15
Joined
Abnormal User
Total Posts: 1894
Joined 12/01/2008
Far as I'm concerned if team has no intention of trying to run the entire race then they shouldn't be allowed to qualify.
Legend
Total Posts: 239
Joined 04/19/2008
NEW RULE IDEA: The only reason you can't finish a race in NASCAR is because of driver injury or damage to the car. If your car is capable, then it must finish or the owner gets fined.
Signature:
“I hate quotations. Tell me what you know."- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Abnormal User
Total Posts: 1372
Joined
Congrats on getting the new scanner for Christmas!
I don't like the 'start and park' teams, never have, and they have been in the sport forever but usually didn't make the fields too often with competition for entering the races where teams were really trying to stay in the top 35 took their places.
Thought there was a new rule in Nascar to stop the 'start and park' people?
Signature:
Ford Fan Forever
Ultimate Insider
Total Posts: 636
Joined
My two cents. I had heard early during last season that Phil really had no interest in that team that they used his name to try to drum up sponsorship. Obviously, he allowed them to do so but he may actually be telling the truth when he denies that he has anything to do with the team.
Signature:
If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
Ultimate Insider
Total Posts: 954
Joined
If he has nothing to do with it and they are using his name without permission, a simple lawyers letter / court filing would pretty much put an end to it.
I don't think all the truth is being revealed.
Signature:
Bernie can take F1 and enjoying it all for himself! Speed needs to drop F1!
Abnormal User
Total Posts: 3868
Joined
chippy457 - 30 December 2008 08:16 AM
NEW RULE IDEA: The only reason you can't finish a race in NASCAR is because of driver injury or damage to the car. If your car is capable, then it must finish or the owner gets fined.
Wait a minute. Sometimes a car is undrivable. You might force a driver to stay in the race with an unsafe vehicle.
Legend
Total Posts: 239
Joined 04/19/2008
NoviVespa3 - 30 December 2008 11:19 AM
chippy457 - 30 December 2008 08:16 AM
NEW RULE IDEA: The only reason you can't finish a race in NASCAR is because of driver injury or damage to the car. If your car is capable, then it must finish or the owner gets fined.
Wait a minute. Sometimes a car is undrivable. You might force a driver to stay in the race with an unsafe vehicle.
That falls under the category of broken to point of undriveable as a sub-statement to the damage part of the rule.
Signature:
“I hate quotations. Tell me what you know."- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Ultimate Insider
Total Posts: 954
Joined
The prize money is posted. These guys have a business model. It has nothing to do with racing except to take the money and go home. All NASCAR has to do is make it so that racing is cheap enough that there are 43 full time teams, and the problem solves itself.
Don't punish the guys that are rubbing NASCAR's arrogant corporate faces in their own droppings. It isn't their fault that NASCAR is dropping the ball again.
Signature:
Bernie can take F1 and enjoying it all for himself! Speed needs to drop F1!
Obeg_
Posted: 30 December 2008 11:33 AM
Speed Freak
Total Posts: 319
Joined
Simple fix: "Top 35 rule" should also mean that NASCAR only pays the top 35 finishing spots. That will stop the start and parkers and make the race to get into the top 35 finishers more interesting during the race. Not to mention make the purse that those who do earn money a bit higher.
Abnormal User
Total Posts: 1217
Joined
Thanks for posting that article, JR. Interesting reading. You'd never see an article like that from the mainstream Nascar press. Don't want to ruffle any feathers or embarass anyone....