New Post
Hot Topic
New Poll
Moved Topic
Sticky Topic
No New Post
Old Hot Topic
Old Poll
Announcement
Closed Topic
Just to let you guys know, the image function has been restored. While the old thread is gone(all of the longer threads were lost), with the img function working, you are free to restart your favorite threads from this forum. The automotive discussion forum, more than any other, really is worthless without pics.
Again, we apologize for any inconvenience.
Name that Car: SPEEDtv forum version
Administrator
Total Posts: 441
Joined
Speed Freak
Total Posts: 486
Joined
Nope. If you recognize either the designer, or the industrialist builder, or the young lady, then you should have no trouble at all finding the car. You seem to have a huge chip on your shoulder about this car - not really sure why. If you know as much as you make it sound like you do (and I have no reason to doubt that you do), then what car is this? It really isn't all that hard to find on the web, in more than one place.
Legend
Total Posts: 209
Joined 04/06/2008
So, the Barracuda "sort of" thing is over ? I've got a good one ready to go but I don't want to step on any toes...
Firelyne's identification above serves the purpose to move on I think.
What'cha got?
Abnormal User
Total Posts: 2335
Joined
Abnormal User
Total Posts: 1192
Joined
1951 Bugatti Type 101 Coach Coachwork by 'Guillore of Courbevoie’
Next one.
Next one.
Signature:
~ Mike
David Hobbs Kablammo Consortium Member #104
Veteran
Total Posts: 110
Joined
Dodge Colt
Abnormal User
Total Posts: 2335
Joined
duplicate post, damnit
Abnormal User
Total Posts: 2335
Joined
It's not a 101. Or postwar. Or by that coachbuilder.
Ultimate Insider
Total Posts: 791
Joined
Phew! I thought I was going crazy! I couldn't find a picture match for the life of me!
Ultimate Insider
Total Posts: 898
Joined
It's not a 101. Or postwar. Or by that coachbuilder.
Are you sure about that? I've seen it identified as such on at least three different sites.The type 101 was based on the 57, but it does have its own type number, and that is a Guilloré body, according to all the references I've found so far.
Oh, and don't worry about helping yourself to my turn. It's not like I had the last correct answer or anything.
Abnormal User
Total Posts: 2335
Joined
It's not a 101. Or postwar. Or by that coachbuilder.
Are you sure about that? I've seen it identified as such on at least three different sites.The type 101 was based on the 57, but it does have its own type number, and that is a Guilloré body, according to all the references I've found so far.
Oh, and don't worry about helping yourself to my turn. It's not like I had the last correct answer or anything.
Oh. Well, since it wasn't my turn anyway (I thought it was a new thread...), I'll just say that I have it as a 1938 57C by Gangloff. Jeez. Never mind.
