Will NASCAR ever get away from this foolishness of PARITY and stop having glorified IROC races?

I don't know if I want to watch races where one team wins just about all the races. And the second and third places are a toss between two other teams. And the rest, multiple laps down.

I have to give this poster some credite for not spelling parity "p-a-r-o-d-y" the way other one post wonders have.

264ret - 17 May 2008 08:17 AM

Will NASCAR ever get away from this foolishness of PARITY and stop having glorified IROC races?

Try as they may, the teams with the money will continue to dominate. Parity might work in other sports, but short of implementing a team spending cap strategy, it just ain't a goin' happy, sports fans...

264ret - 17 May 2008 08:17 AM

Will NASCAR ever get away from this foolishness of PARITY and stop having glorified IROC races?

If there really is parity, why can't MWR, the Woods brother, RedBull, and other field fillers win? Why do the same teams win all of the races?

whip2 - 17 May 2008 12:03 PM

264ret - 17 May 2008 08:17 AM

Will NASCAR ever get away from this foolishness of PARITY and stop having glorified IROC races?

If there really is parity, why can't MWR, the Woods brother, RedBull, and other field fillers win? Why do the same teams win all of the races?

DRIVERS

Mearn - 17 May 2008 12:05 PM

whip2 - 17 May 2008 12:03 PM

264ret - 17 May 2008 08:17 AM

Will NASCAR ever get away from this foolishness of PARITY and stop having glorified IROC races?

If there really is parity, why can't MWR, the Woods brother, RedBull, and other field fillers win? Why do the same teams win all of the races?

DRIVERS

NASCAR's brainchild, the COT, was suppose to bring about parity and make better competition. All it did was make the gap between the large rich teams and the smaller ones even greater.

What was there before, is there now. The only way to do it is to handicap them like in horseracing. After qualifying, you add weights to the fast cars.