<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">

    <title type="text">SPEEDtv.com Forums</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.speedtv.com/forums/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.speedtv.com/forums/atom/" />
    <updated></updated>
    <rights>Copyright (c) 2009</rights>
    <generator uri="http://www.http://expressionengine.com" version="1.6.1">ExpressionEngine</generator>
    <id>tag:speedtv.com,2009:11:21</id>


    <entry>
      <title>Was KERS really a green technology as it was used in Formula 1&#63;</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.speedtv.com/forums/viewthread/476792/" />      
      <id>tag:speedtv.com,2009:forums/viewthread/.476792</id>
      <published>2009-11-17T12:30:59Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>film-freak</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        I know KERS is now a dead issue, but I was curious. Does anyone know if KERS really saved gas, considering the way the drivers used it? I would believe that it would give better gas mileage if the drivers were, say, on a straight section of track, and they pressed the KERS button while maintaining the same speed. But every time I saw it being used was for increased acceleration, like a turbocharger. When used in this way, with the engine already on maximum acceleration, it seems there wouldn't be any gas savings. If this is the case, KERS wasn't green or environmental. I wasn't against KERS and it added an interesting element to F1 racing, but it seemed requiring it so that it would be good for the environment when it may not have been would have been an unnecessary cost.
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Question about modeling assumptions</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.speedtv.com/forums/viewthread/477072/" />      
      <id>tag:speedtv.com,2009:forums/viewthread/.477072</id>
      <published>2009-11-19T20:48:11Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>Audiophile426</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        I was wondering about some of the assumptions made when modeling the aerodynamics of the F1 cars. As near as i can tell in the CFD models used to model the cars the car is stationary and the air moves over the car. That is the same with wind tunnels, the air is moved over the car. I understand that it is reasonable to assume that the car will behave the same whether moving through the air or remaining stationary when the air moves over the car. However i would really doubt that that it is a perfect assumption. Also i think that it would be a much worse assumption when the air that the car is moving through is not uniform in flow and density. I think that the air around an F1 track during a race is probably not anywhere near uniform. Particularly right behind another car. So my question is since F1 is so competitive why arent the teams modeling the cars moving through the air instead of the other way around. Or do they already do that? I'm particularly interested in the modeling stuff since i am an engineering student and would really love to work for a formula one team someday. I think that more and more complex models are the way of the future.
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>F1 Gears</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.speedtv.com/forums/viewthread/476908/" />      
      <id>tag:speedtv.com,2009:forums/viewthread/.476908</id>
      <published>2009-11-18T13:23:05Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>cruzcntrl</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <span style="font-size:14px;"></span><span style="color:blue;"></span><br />
I have a gear question for tech folks. Given FIA guidelines for a max rpm of F1 engines, and given the power-to-weight ratio of the cars..with the aero surfaces for minimal wind resistance, I am looking at extreme top speed possibilities of a current F1 car, well beyond 200mph. Given that you can see the cars hold at a max rpm level on long straights, and that the cars stay around 200mph max, the FIA must have a final gear ratio rule in place...correct??<span style="font-size:14px;"></span>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>F1 Motor Oil&#63;</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.speedtv.com/forums/viewthread/471026/" />      
      <id>tag:speedtv.com,2009:forums/viewthread/.471026</id>
      <published>2009-09-26T23:27:06Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>ipso</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        What engine oil is used in F1?  Any different than say in IRL?  Is it even close to the synthetic oil we purchase?  They probably use some kind of 1W-1 ultra low viscosity/friction type, since it only has to last a few race weekends.<br />
<br />
I wonder if something like that (a new additive) could explain an extra X number of added HP over the course of, oh…, say a Mercedes season.  That’s a good way to sandbag: start the season with tractor oil and slowly lean it out to gain an advantage.  I wonder what the oil pressure is in an F1 engine too?<br />
<br />
<img src="http://cens.com/cens/supplier/17811/product/61460/BIG.jpg"  width="350" height="350"  alt='BIG.jpg width=350 height=350 ' /><br />
<br />
(Growing up I’ve always been fascinated by how many motor oil commercials we’ve been exposed to.  Thousands and thousands and thousands of them.  How much do people spend on motor oil a year?  I have no idea how all the marketing pays for itself.  I’ve never once purchased anything but one brand.  …Which of course – now that I think about it – is exactly the reason why it’s so important to spend, to convert people early.)
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>gas tank</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.speedtv.com/forums/viewthread/475820/" />      
      <id>tag:speedtv.com,2009:forums/viewthread/.475820</id>
      <published>2009-11-07T09:15:31Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>medingen</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        With the new "no refuelling" rule, would it not make sense to have two fuel tanks (front and back) to shift weight as needed? Or do the regs rule that out?
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Self&#45;starters for F1 cars&#8230;NOT a good idea!</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.speedtv.com/forums/viewthread/474386/" />      
      <id>tag:speedtv.com,2009:forums/viewthread/.474386</id>
      <published>2009-10-23T15:46:44Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>boogatti</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        During the Brazil practice session, our illustrious commentators were discussing the virtues of an F1 self-starting car. Although, I wish my F1 heroes had the feature in previous championships, I'm not in favor of it. I put the self-starting feature in the same category as traction control. When an F1 driver is paid a multi-million dollar salary, he should be able to keep the engine fire alive, even under adverse situations. I'm afraid that there will be a tendency for the driver to be less careful about off track excursions just because he will be able to restart on demand. For this reason, self-starters should be disallowed. It separates the champions from the rest of the field!
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>F1 fasteners and resistance to loosening under vibration</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.speedtv.com/forums/viewthread/475504/" />      
      <id>tag:speedtv.com,2009:forums/viewthread/.475504</id>
      <published>2009-11-03T22:01:42Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>wkroebig</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        Does anyone have any general info on fasteners used on F1 cars? I am particularly interested in how the quick change nose operation goes. I think the Honda change was particularly slick. Any info would be great. Also, how do think they lock fasteners (or do they, based on Massa's spring accident). The FIC WRC guys must have that down to an art as well.
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Self&#45;Starting F1 Cars&#63;</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.speedtv.com/forums/viewthread/473536/" />      
      <id>tag:speedtv.com,2009:forums/viewthread/.473536</id>
      <published>2009-10-17T08:17:51Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>US_F1_Fan</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        During Brazil practice 2 Fisi stalled. David, Bob, Steve and Peter ALL said they should have on board starters.<br />
<br />
They do! It's an 80BHP electric motor called KERS!
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Serious motorhead porn&#45;&#45;&#45;</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.speedtv.com/forums/viewthread/471666/" />      
      <id>tag:speedtv.com,2009:forums/viewthread/.471666</id>
      <published>2009-10-01T21:58:07Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>p2</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        Man, Ultimate Factories on Nat Geo channel did great job on the Lambo factory.  Had to watch the engine building section 3 times----awsome.<br />
<br />
Wish we could get this storta stuff in the logical place--SPEED---but I guess NASCAR and Pinks and the other idiotic programing is cheeper to produce and is more profitable.<br />
<br />
Too bad, I'd almost send more the Direct TV every month for quality motor programing like that, but I guess I already do.<br />
<br />
No matter, good show, check it out if it comes round again.<br />
<br />
p2
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>On board Video of F1 Radio Controled Car</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.speedtv.com/forums/viewthread/474820/" />      
      <id>tag:speedtv.com,2009:forums/viewthread/.474820</id>
      <published>2009-10-28T08:58:05Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>masterofpuppets</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        This is an awesome little video I found on You tube of an on board camera shot of a Radio Controled F1 car<br />
I hope you enjoy it....<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/tiranoAC#p/u/0/X4b0Zv8RKIQ">http://www.youtube.com/user/tiranoAC#p/u/0/X4b0Zv8RKIQ</a>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>


</feed>